Search the library
Keyword search across the published essays. It points you to the closest piece — it does not answer for me.
Framework 02

Reversible / Irreversible

One question, applied relentlessly: can this be undone? It is the cleanest line I know between what to automate and what to gate.

Test 01Name the action+

State precisely what the system is about to do — not the category, the specific act.

Test 02Ask: undoable?+

If it can be cleanly reversed, automate it. Speed has almost no downside here.

Test 03If not — gate it+

Anything irreversible or public routes to a human. A pause always costs less than a retraction.

Test 04Log the choice+

Every gate decision is recorded, so the boundary itself can be reviewed and refined.

Rewriting a draft: reversible, automate. Sending an email to 40,000 subscribers: irreversible, gate. The test takes five seconds and removes the entire debate.

Worked example — the framework applied to a real decision, not a hypothetical.

PDFThe reversibility test — one-pager
In preparation
CSVAction classification sheet
In preparation

These companion resources are still being written — nothing here is downloadable yet. Everything the framework needs to be run by hand is already on the Steps and Prompt tabs. Want to be told when they land? Say so here.

Ready-to-use prompt
Given a list of automated actions, classify each as REVERSIBLE or IRREVERSIBLE. For each IRREVERSIBLE action, propose the smallest possible human-approval gate that would prevent a costly mistake without slowing the reversible work around it.

The test earns its keep the first time it stops something. Applied consistently, the debate about whether a given action "needs approval" disappears — the question is only ever whether it can be undone, and that has one answer.